The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities
- PDF / 229,203 Bytes
- 9 Pages / 595.28 x 793.7 pts Page_size
- 3 Downloads / 178 Views
RESEARCH
Open Access
The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities Michal Harty*, Maryka Griesel and Aletia van der Merwe
Abstract Background: Joint rehabilitation goals are an important component for effective teamwork in the rehabilitation field. The activities and participation domain of the ICF provides a common language for professionals when setting these goals. Involving clients in the formulation of rehabilitation goals is gaining momentum as part of a person-centred approach to rehabilitation. However, this is particularly difficult when clients have an acquired communication disability. The expressive communication difficulties negatively affect the consensus building process. As a result, obtaining information regarding rehabilitation goals from professionals and their clients warrants further investigation for this particular population. Methods: This comparative study investigated clients and their assigned rehabilitation professionals’ perception of the importance of ICF activities and participation domains for inclusion in their rehabilitation program. Twelve clients in an acute rehabilitation centre and twenty of their corresponding rehabilitation professionals participated in an activity using the Talking Mats™ visual framework for goal setting. Each participant rated the importance of the nine activities and participation domains of the ICF for inclusion in their current rehabilitation program. Results: The ICF domains which consistently appear as very important across these groups are mobility, self-care and communication. Domains which consistently appear in the lower third of the rankings include spare time, learning and thinking and domestic life. Results indicate however that no statistical significant differences exist in terms of the individual domains across each of the participant groups. Within group differences however indicated that amongst the speech-language therapists and physiotherapists there was a statistical significant difference between spare time activities and communication and mobility. Conclusions: Findings indicate that consensus is possible amongst professionals and clients even within an acuterehabilitation setting. In addition, the Talking Mats™ visual framework appears to be a valid protocol for including clients with acquired communication disabilities in the process of obtaining consensus during goal-setting.
Background The concept of person-centred care is currently receiving attention in the rehabilitation literature [1]. Person or client-centred care implies adherence to at least 3 principles namely: the client themselves are at the centre of the care process [2]; the clients autonomy is the starting point of the rehabilitation [3] and the relationship with professional service providers is characterized by a power through relationship not a power over * Correspondence: [email protected] Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, University of Pretoria, Corner of Lynwood and Roper St
Data Loading...
