Correction to: Effects of chemical sterilization of the culture media, porous membranes and luminosity on in vitro cultu

  • PDF / 734,757 Bytes
  • 3 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 10 Downloads / 195 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


CORRECTION

Correction to: Effects of chemical sterilization of the culture media, porous membranes and luminosity on in vitro culture of Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla Letícia Vaz Molinari1 · Denys Matheus Santana Costa Souza1 · Maria Lopes Martins Avelar1 · Sérgio Bruno Fernandes1 · Douglas Santos Gonçalves1 · Júlio Cézar Tannure Faria1 · Dulcineia de Carvalho1 · Gilvano Ebling Brondani1 

© Northeast Forestry University 2020

Correction to: J . For. Res. https​://doi.org/10.1007/s1167​6-020-01240​-5

In the original publication of the article, there were errors in the fig 3 and fig 6. The corrected Figs. 3 and 6 are given below: The original article has been corrected.

The original article can be found online at https​://doi. org/10.1007/s1167​6-020-01240​-5. * Letícia Vaz Molinari [email protected] * Gilvano Ebling Brondani [email protected] 1



Department of Forestry Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil

13

Vol.:(0123456789)

Fig. 3  In vitro multiplication features recorded for different active-chlorine concentrations (0.000%, 0.001%, 0.003%, and 0.005%) and E. grandis Hill (ex. Maiden) × E. urophylla S.T. Blake clones (C1 and C2). a and b: Shoot chlorosis, c and d: Shoot oxidation, e and f: Shoot length, g: Number of shoots per explant. Means followed by the same letter did not differ in Tukey’s test at 5% significance level

13

L. V. Molinari et al.

Correction to: Effects of chemical sterilization of the culture media, porous membranes and… Fig. 6  In vitro adventitious rooting features observed as function of different light sources (dark and light) and sealing forms (W/M, 1/M and 3/M). a: Root length, b: Number of roots per explant, c and d: Root diameter, e: Rooting rate; a, b and e: lowercase letters represent statistical differences among different sealing forms in the same treatment (light source); uppercase letters represent statistical differences among different light sources in the same treatment (sealing forms). Means followed by the same letter did not differ in the Tukey’s test at 5% significance level

Publisher’s Note  Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

13