Identification of sources of heavy metals in agricultural soils using multivariate analysis and GIS
- PDF / 565,598 Bytes
- 10 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 93 Downloads / 251 Views
SOILS, SEC 3 & REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED OR DEGRADED LANDS & RESEARCH ARTICLE
Identification of sources of heavy metals in agricultural soils using multivariate analysis and GIS Yushu Shan & Mats Tysklind & Fanghua Hao & Wei Ouyang & Siyang Chen & Chunye Lin
Received: 30 October 2012 / Accepted: 6 December 2012 / Published online: 9 January 2013 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
Abstract Purpose Heavy metals in agricultural soils readily enter the food chain when taken up by plants, but there have been few investigations of heavy metal pressure in farming areas with low background concentrations. This study was carried out in a cultivation area of Northeast China that has undergone decades of intensive farming, with the aim of identifying the sources of accumulated heavy metals in agricultural soils using multivariate analysis and geographic information system (GIS). Materials and methods In 2011, concentrations of total iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co), as well as soil pH and organic matter, were measured at 149 sites in arable soils in the study area. The principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to extract hidden subsets from the raw dataset in order to detect possible sources. Metal contents in soils from various croplands were further investigated using analysis of variance. With the Kriging interpolation method, GIS was used to display the PCA results spatially to explore the influence of land use on heavy metal accumulation. Results and discussion Most of the studied metals in arable soils of the study area were shown to have low concentrations, except for Cd (0.241 mgkg−1). According to the results of the PCA analysis, Fe, Mn, Pb, Zn, Cd, and Co formed the first component (PC1) explaining 40.1 % of the total variance. The source of these metals was attributed to Responsible editor: Willie Peijnenburg Y. Shan : F. Hao : W. Ouyang (*) : S. Chen : C. Lin State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China e-mail: [email protected] Y. Shan : M. Tysklind Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
farming practices (“anthropogenic” factor). Cu, Ni, and Cr fell into the second component (PC2), heavy metals that derived from parent rock materials (“lithogetic” factor). This component describes 24.6 % of the total variance. Compared to paddy lands, soils in drylands had greater accumulations of all the metals in PC1, which can be explained by a higher rate of phosphorus fertilizer application and a longer farming history. Conclusions Owing to the natural low backgrounds, soils in the study area were safe from heavy metal pollution with a contamination risk of Cd the only exception. Multivariate analysis and GIS were effective means in helping to identify the sources of soil metals and addressing the land use influence on soil metals accumulation. This work can support the development of stra
Data Loading...
