Outside the Self
The Allegheny Riverfront Park of Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, conceived from the outset with artists Ann Hamilton and Michael Mercil and international engineering firm Arup, proves that a collaborative model of action can work for the making of a p
- PDF / 328,484 Bytes
- 6 Pages / 577 x 648 pts Page_size
- 110 Downloads / 227 Views
		    The Allegheny Riverfront Park of Michael Van
 
 in ways that increase the potency of meaning and
 
 Valkenburgh Associates, conceived from the outset
 
 experience in projects. Among the characteristics
 
 with artists Ann Hamilton and Michael Mercil and
 
 that contribute to this collaborative disposition:
 
 international engineering firm Arup, proves that
 
 a confident self-reliance that arises from a deep
 
 a collaborative model of action can work for the
 
 and practiced love of landscape architecture, and
 
 making of a public urban landscape. The willing-
 
 a sensibility rooted in the close study of artists
 
 ness and skill required to promote shared design
 
 whose own production is shaped by investigation,
 
 responsibility are rare commodities, however,
 
 experimentation, and the careful development
 
 and in Pittsburgh they have resulted in a work
 
 of personal conviction within the core of a proj-
 
 of unusual originality and uncommon success.
 
 ect’s ideas.
 
 Indeed, while the park exhibits several ingredients
 
 about his work know of his fondly stated devo-
 
 or the engineers or the landscape architects, the
 
 tion to plant life. Yet while it may seem obvious
 
 project team reports an intense and overlapping
 
 that a landscape architect professes a love of his
 
 collaborative spirit that enables each to claim
 
 medium, the sustained intensity displayed here
 
 more than the usual intellectual purchase on both
 
 is far from the usual. Moreover, by the example
 
 the parts and the whole.
 
 of his incessant drive toward a more creative
 
 My interest here is in the two-way street of
 
 148
 
 Those who have heard Van Valkenburgh talk
 
 that would appear to be attributable to the artists
 
 application of both conventional horticultural
 
 Michael Van Valkenburgh’s artist/designer ethos.
 
 technique and experimental trial and error, Van
 
 An artist in his own right, he nonetheless seeks
 
 Valkenburgh has, for over two decades, helped the
 
 the artistic input of others. He has demonstrated a
 
 field return its focus to plants, soil, and climatic
 
 readiness to collaborate with colleagues and artists
 
 effects as an ever-growing source of expressive
 
 potential. Rather like the heroic Dan Kiley of a
 
 architects—and sadly bereft of the rich material
 
 previous generation—whose personal knowledge
 
 qualities that plants offered.
 
 (and love) of plants has rarely been discussed but
 
 Few heard Rose’s call, and the long period
 
 was abundantly clear to those who worked with
 
 between the late 1930s and the 1980s did little to
 
 him—Van Valkenburgh turned his affinity for the
 
 change this, especially as landscape professionals
 
 hedgerows and orchards and groves of agricultural
 
 pursued the challenges of suburbanization and the
 
 landscapes into an obsession with planted forms
 
 environmental movement. But by the late 1980s,
 
 and their possibilities for shaping spatial experi-
 
 Van Valkenburgh’s recurring fascinations with
 
 ence. A passion rooted in childhood evolved into
 
 color, light, reflection, wetness, frost, growth and
 
 a broad, investigative practice. In this case, it also
 
 habit,		
Data Loading...
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	