Outside the Self

The Allegheny Riverfront Park of Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, conceived from the outset with artists Ann Hamilton and Michael Mercil and international engineering firm Arup, proves that a collaborative model of action can work for the making of a p

  • PDF / 328,484 Bytes
  • 6 Pages / 577 x 648 pts Page_size
  • 110 Downloads / 206 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


The Allegheny Riverfront Park of Michael Van

in ways that increase the potency of meaning and

Valkenburgh Associates, conceived from the outset

experience in projects. Among the characteristics

with artists Ann Hamilton and Michael Mercil and

that contribute to this collaborative disposition:

international engineering firm Arup, proves that

a confident self-reliance that arises from a deep

a collaborative model of action can work for the

and practiced love of landscape architecture, and

making of a public urban landscape. The willing-

a sensibility rooted in the close study of artists

ness and skill required to promote shared design

whose own production is shaped by investigation,

responsibility are rare commodities, however,

experimentation, and the careful development

and in Pittsburgh they have resulted in a work

of personal conviction within the core of a proj-

of unusual originality and uncommon success.

ect’s ideas.

Indeed, while the park exhibits several ingredients

about his work know of his fondly stated devo-

or the engineers or the landscape architects, the

tion to plant life. Yet while it may seem obvious

project team reports an intense and overlapping

that a landscape architect professes a love of his

collaborative spirit that enables each to claim

medium, the sustained intensity displayed here

more than the usual intellectual purchase on both

is far from the usual. Moreover, by the example

the parts and the whole.

of his incessant drive toward a more creative

My interest here is in the two-way street of

148

Those who have heard Van Valkenburgh talk

that would appear to be attributable to the artists

application of both conventional horticultural

Michael Van Valkenburgh’s artist/designer ethos.

technique and experimental trial and error, Van

An artist in his own right, he nonetheless seeks

Valkenburgh has, for over two decades, helped the

the artistic input of others. He has demonstrated a

field return its focus to plants, soil, and climatic

readiness to collaborate with colleagues and artists

effects as an ever-growing source of expressive

potential. Rather like the heroic Dan Kiley of a

architects—and sadly bereft of the rich material

previous generation—whose personal knowledge

qualities that plants offered.

(and love) of plants has rarely been discussed but

Few heard Rose’s call, and the long period

was abundantly clear to those who worked with

between the late 1930s and the 1980s did little to

him—Van Valkenburgh turned his affinity for the

change this, especially as landscape professionals

hedgerows and orchards and groves of agricultural

pursued the challenges of suburbanization and the

landscapes into an obsession with planted forms

environmental movement. But by the late 1980s,

and their possibilities for shaping spatial experi-

Van Valkenburgh’s recurring fascinations with

ence. A passion rooted in childhood evolved into

color, light, reflection, wetness, frost, growth and

a broad, investigative practice. In this case, it also

habit,