Covering behaviour of echinoids in an Arctic fjord
- PDF / 321,024 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 18 Downloads / 147 Views
OCEANARIUM
Covering behaviour of echinoids in an Arctic fjord Tomasz Borszcz & Piotr Balazy & Piotr Kukliński
Received: 30 August 2013 / Revised: 20 January 2014 / Accepted: 20 January 2014 # The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Several reports suggest that piling debris on the surface of echinoid skeletons, so-called ‘masking’ or ‘covering’ behaviour, provides camouflage or physical protection against predators. Others have ascribed masking in shallow water echinoids to a response to light incidence or UV radiation (e.g. Fig. 1 Covering behaviour of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (O.F. Müller). Arrows indicate covered individuals. Badge number (a, b) is 5 cm long
T. Borszcz (*) : P. Balazy : P. Kukliński Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Powstancow Warszawy 55, Sopot 81-712, Poland e-mail: [email protected] P. Kukliński Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
Adams 2001; Verling et al. 2002). Further studies have argued that covers are used due to multiple factors (Dumont et al. 2007), including protection from desiccation or as ballast in turbulent waters. Observations from the bathyal zone (Pawson and Pawson 2013) showed that light or most factors
Mar Biodiv
hypothesised to cause covering in shallow water echinoids are insufficient to explain such behaviour in the deep sea and hence reinvestigations are needed. We report a new finding from Isfjorden (Spitsbergen), where abundant sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (O.F. Müller), frequently (25.7 % among 498 echinoids captured by 99 photographs) cover their bodies with the shells of bivalves (Fig. 1a), gastropods, calcareous algae (Fig. 1b), stones (Fig. 1c), seaweed and dead conspecifics (Fig. 1d), without notable selectivity. At the surveyed depths (5–30 m), benthic light intensity is high (up to 14 466 lx), as recorded by multi-year data from multiple loggers. Simultaneously, predation is rather low, as evidenced by high echinoid density, their non-bimodal size distribution and the lack of repair scars or regenerated echinoid spines. Low predator diversity, abundance, metabolism, and rarely observed attacks on echinoids during hundreds of SCUBA hours support the argument of low predation intensity. Covered and uncovered individuals co-occur (Fig. 1b, c), while all are exposed to the same dose of light and have the same probability of being eaten. Thus, the covering behaviour adopted by a number of shallow water species worldwide accounts for non-functional interpretation, e.g. tactile reflex action, which is similar
to echinoids living in bathyal settings (Pawson and Pawson 2013). Acknowledgements National Science Centre (NCN) grants (2011/03/ N/ST10/05776, DEC-2011/01/N/NZ8/04493), the START scholarship from the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) and “Mobilnosc Plus” provided support. Julian Gutt, Pedro Martinez Arbizu, Isaac Westfield and reviewers are acknowledged for their suggestions. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the C
Data Loading...
