Dry Composite Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries
- PDF / 621,050 Bytes
- 6 Pages / 414.72 x 648 pts Page_size
- 91 Downloads / 333 Views
		    511 Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 496 ©1998 Materials Research Society
 
 150
 
 .= 0 0
 
 50
 
 100
 
 150
 
 200
 
 250
 
 300
 
 350
 
 400
 
 450
 
 500
 
 Z' [n] 200____________________
 
 PEOLiCIO I0w/oy-LiAIO 2. • ......... ... ----............. .. 04 +•........ ............. .. 150.........600..h............ ........... .
 
 10 .......... .: . ......... ...........
 
 10
 
 Si
 
 -----. .......: ............:
 
 .. ..... ........... :......... V1 2 ........ ;...........
 
 ::0
 
 D oooooo~n v:VVVVVV
 
 I
 
 .
 
 V
 
 V ri
 
 n
 
 v
 
 760 hB
 
 0 0
 
 50
 
 30 p-q 20 h:
 
 I
 
 100
 
 150
 
 200
 
 250
 
 PEO5 LiCIO4 +
 
 203
 
 10 Wlo zeolite
 
 400
 
 450
 
 500
 
 40h
 
 .0o
 
 L 0
 
 .. 10
 
 350
 
 0:0
 
 ~VV.VV 0
 
 300
 
 20
 
 30
 
 40
 
 .. .. 50
 
 60
 
 70
 
 1990 h ......... 0 .. 80
 
 90
 
 100
 
 Z' I[1 Figure 1: Time evolution of the impedance response of symmetrical Li/electrolyte/Li cells using a plain PEO-LiCIO 4 (A), a composite PEO-LiCIO 4 + 10 w/oy-LiA10 2 (B) or a composite PEO-LiC10 4 + 10 w/o zeolite (C) electrolyte (w/o = weight percent). The time of storage is indicated directly on the curves. Temperature: 106 'C. Frequency range: 0.1Hz - 65 kHz.
 
 The figure clearly shows that, while in the plain electrolyte the width of the semicircle progressively increases with time (this suggesting a continuous growth of a passivation layer
 
 512
 
 on the lithium electrode surface), in the two composite electrolytes the width does not vary consistently over a prolonged period of time (this suggesting the occurrence of a stable and compact passivation layer). These results confirm that the dispersed ceramic powder indeed promotes stabilization of the lithium interface in PEO-LiX electrolytes, probably by trapping water and other liquid impurities which otherwise would react with the lithium electrode with the continuous formation of not-uniform, porous passivation layers[5]I.
 
 Lithium Salt
 
 PEO
 
 Ceramic Additive
 
 Mixing and weighing
 
 Zn0
 
 Masking
 
 Homogenizing
 
 Hot pressing
 
 Figure 2: Scheme of the preparation procedure of dry, hot-pressed, composite electrolyte membranes. 513
 
 To further enhance interfacial stabilization, we have prepared ceramic powder-added composite electrolytes using a procedure where the presence of any liquid was avoided throughout the entire process. The procedure consisted in the direct reaction of the electrolyte components obtained by hot pressing an intimate mixture of PEO, LiX and the selected ceramic additive (Figure 2). This procedure excludes the presence of any residual solvent and gives uniform composite electrolyte membranes. These "dry" membranes have a conductivity similar to that offered by their parent electrolytes prepared by the common casting process (Figure 3). However, the dry character of the procedure induces a further consistent improvement in the stabilization of the lithium interfacial stability, as demonstrated by Figure 4 which shows in comparison the impedance response determined after a comparable amount of storage time of two similar cells using the two types of composite electrolytes. The semicircle-width response of the cell using the hot-pressed composi		
Data Loading...
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	